Youngsters who commit criminal acts present a versatility of involvement in illegal behavior. They argon not necessarily violent or nonviolent criminals. Rather, it is the frequency and serious-mindedness of their involvement in various kinds of criminal behavior that be the best indicators of future serious criminal activity. In addition, those who commit violent crimes ordinarily start out that way, not embodiment up to it, suggesting that they are a particular type of individual.
statistical studies have suggested a profile of violent juvenile offenders. veritable(prenominal)ly they are black or Hispanic males from unstable, often one-parent families in which there is a high degree of conflict (Kramer, 1988, p. 14). They usually don't get along with their parents, who provide little or no supervision, and were very young when they began to commit crimes, very often with deplorable support. Further, they tend to be school dropouts and for all practical purposes are unemployable.
With these types of juveniles entering the justice system, many experts complain the system is deplorably inadequate. Criminologist Wolfgang Pindur says: "Most prosecutors and judges don't want to deal with kids,
Historically, juvenile criminals have been separated from adults when incarcerated. The approach was one of rehabilitation as opposed to outright punishment since the typical juvenile delinquent in the 1800s was caught stealing things such as coal to be used at home or copper fixtures for resell. By the end of the century most states had conventional separate correctional facilities for juvenile criminals known as reformatories or training schools (Kramer, 1988, p. 66).
o He may be displace in a special institution for juveniles (Kramer, 1988, p. 10). Institutions range from small, informally-run aggroup homes possibly operated by private social agencies contracting with the state, to large, high-security institutions in isolated areas.
In 1899, the first juvenile court was created In Illinois to ensure the separation of children from adult criminals. Shortly thereafter jurisprudence set in concrete the judicial philosophy that was to restrain over the juvenile justice system until the 1960s: that a child was not to be tried for a crime but, instead, was to be viewed as someone in need of the like and protection of the state (Kramer, 1988, p. 66).
who end up getting band-aid preaching" (Gest, 1988, p.50). Others have said the system is in disarray and has no credibility with police.
Statistics have shown, however, that the system is not working, and many prosecutors and legal philosophy enforcement are calling for tougher legal response to chronic offenders. Increasingly, however the death penalty is being sought for most serious offenders, despite their youth. Apparently society agrees with this approach because, as of 1988, thirty-seven juvenile criminals await execution on death row. What does this mean for the juvenile justice system? Is such action honourable as well as constitutional?
Those pushing for stronger measures moot the system has failed at filtering out treatment for career criminals. deviate of the problem, they believe, is due to the strict rules on
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment