Views of Subjectivity by Michael Foucault

Foucault believed that bowivity was crated through position throughout history and by interaction with new(prenominal)s. His belief was that proponent non only bewitchs our subjectivity, but is actually responsible for its shaping. He similarly contends that subjectivity is similarly a result of knowledge, and that the twain are clearly connected. Facts and knowledge help in the fundamental law of self-importance, and determine how the self interacts with the world. Knowledge also is responsible for the ecesis of objectivity, but this type of knowledge differs from the knowledge responsible for the formation of self, because the knowledge for formation of self comes from an individual's experiences and interactions with the world around him and with other individuals, and hence from social structures. In this way, the knowledge which helps construct self is colored by an individual's own perceptions of facts, and this knowledge which builds self also builds subjectivity.

For Foucault, identities are self-representations or fixations which are, in truth, not fixed and not stable. The subject does not exist separate from the culture in which it lives. The subject is not a substantive entity but is to a greater extent a process with an open system of possibilities available to it. It is not a determined collection of practices and possibilities, but is always subject to change.

Foucault argues for an aesthetic view of the person as a honourable durationnt in whom "care of ones

Foucault, M. (2000). P. Rabinow, (ed.): Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, Vol.1. New York, NY: New York Press.

Foucault was heavily influence by the German philosophers Frederick Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. Nietzsche held that kind behavior is motivated by a will to power, while Heidegger was sharply critical of what he described as "our current technological understanding of being." Foucault examined the alter patterns of power within a society and the manner in which power relates to the self.

He examined rules which govern the claims that could be determined as true or false at various times in history, and determined how everyday practices allowed people to define their identities and to play up knowledge. In his view, events were produced by human effort, nature, and God. Foucault does not offer a blanket understanding of these various methods of understanding, noting that each has its advantages and its disadvantages.

elf" in the manner of "inner dialogue" is seen as an appropriate channel which takes the individual away from the confusion created in the absence of chaste grounds. This process would necessarily require the development of an ethics of self. Foucault tries to base that the basic ideas which individuals accept as permanent truths about human nature and society, change during the course of history, and as a result, the claims make by Foucault challenge the writings of other philosophers and thinkers such as Karl Marx. Foucault's new concepts challenge the claims of others about various aspects of society, as he looks at various systems such as prisons, police, welfare, and the care of the mentally ill in this collection of his works.

In the ever-changing, rapidly-progressing technological age of the 21st century, our whole way of life is
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!