Reactions to Hooks’ Feminism is for Everybody Essay -- Essays Papers

Reactions to Hooks Feminism is for Everybody I am not a wo manpowers liberationist simply because I was raised in a womens rightist household. I am not a feminist because I am an independent, improve woman. I am not a feminist because I am a bitter female, nor because I am a woman scorned. I am not a feminist because I hate men, nor because I am a lesbian nor because I like to listen to the indigotin Girls. To the contrary I love men and I am not a lesbian. While I agree with hooks that feminism is a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation, and oppression (viii), I believe that her rendering of feminism states the goals of the movement rather than actually defining the term itself. In my mind, feminism is a synonym for comparison. I am a feminist because I believe in the equality between men and women, sheet of paper and simple. No hidden agenda, no gimmicks, no tricky explanations. Sounds like an wanton enough concept to comprehend. So why then is feminism such a misunde rstood and fe ard notion? Why has this ism in picky become the new f- record book of pop culture? Equality is a word commonly associated with American culture it is a long-standing theme of our history. This does not put on a great deal of sense to me. After all, America was schematic on the premise that all MEN are created EQUAL. The term men is very specific as is the rest of the wording of the Constitution. It is doubtful that the launch fathers of our country meant this to include men and women or else they would wee-wee stated incisively that. It is only in the latter half of the past century that this equality was extended to include the fair treatment of all peoples, regardless of race, gender, or ethnicity. America was first settled in large part by religious outcasts seeking a saf... ...y personal movement. hooks encourages her readers to demand alternatives to patriarchal, racist, and discriminatory culture, and to imagine a different future. Her book literally spe aks to everybody, asking readers, whether they are feminist or not, to take look at feminism in a new light, to see that it touches all lives. No longer impart people (men or women) have the excuse that feminism is too composite plant to understand, nor will they be able to get by on third-hand fellowship (as hooks refers to on vii) of the topic. As hooks intended, I finally have a book to hand to all of my friends (both male and female) who gave me strained looks because I lived on Mt. Vernon last year or because I am more than willing to admit that I am proud to be a feminist. hooks shows that feminismfar from being an outdated concept or one limited to an intellectual eliteis indeed for everybody.