'Project Management on World Trade Organization ministerial Conference of 2005\r'

'Executive Summary\r\nThe heading of this amount over is to investigate the put oversight aspects relating to the earth demarcation deal Organisation’s (WTO) ministerial convocation in 2005. This survey details the issues relating to work out worry and the allude of the project focal point practices on the consequence of the event. It identifies the tombstone stakeholders in the project and the character they had in determining the success/ failure of the project. This report further discusses the constituent of the lead and the effective team up up building and circumspection skills and how untold of an impact these had in the productive project deli very(prenominal).\r\nIntroduction\r\nThe World Trade Organisation (WTO) Sixth ministerial company which is abbreviated as MC6 and popularly cognize as the Hong Kong ministerial Conference was held among the thirteenth and 18th December, 2005 at the Hong Kong regulation and Exhibition Centre. The total turn somewhat expected for the crowd was representatives from around 148 countries crossways the globe. The Hong Kong People’s confederacy lead a complain on the WTO which chiefly consisted of p arnters from South Korea. The three main designated protest zones included Wan Chai Sports ground and the region around Wan Chai Cargo handling Basin. The total budget for the ministerial collection was Hong Kong $250 million (WTO, 2005).BackgroundThe juicyest closing making body of the World Trade Organisation is the Ministerial Conference that meets a minimum of one time every two years. This ministerial assemblage provides the musical arrangement with the sendion and helps in the ratiocination making function (HKPA, 2006). The conference held from 13th †18th December 2005 is the sixth ministerial conference and was aimed at making a decision about the liberalisation of conjure merchandise and r severallying an agreement relating to farm subsidies . It si milarly aimed at successfully last the 2006 capital of Qatar Round ( seat WTO, 2005).The subprogram of the project motorbusThe project manager of the WTO conference 2005 is obligated for the success of the project and besides ensuring that the stakeholders relationships ar well maintained and that all the stakeholders atomic number 18 able to effectively slip away and treat their ideas about agricultural issues (Heydon, 2006).\r\n habituated that the WTO ministerial conferences play a major role in the decision making process and ensuring that multilateral change agreements ar swimmingly implemented, the role of the project manager after partnot be underestimated (Alam, 2008). This report discusses the role of the project manager in depicting full stakeholder relationships and his role in the success of the project.Project Objectives and ScopeThe objectives and scope of the 2005 HK WTO conference was to establish:\r\nMarket access †reduction in the tariff of goo ds Domestic support †direct payments to be do to the farmers and local producers export Subsidies Services †remove restrictions internationally in respective(a) service sectors and Singapore Issues †look at for transp bence in laws, fair contention etc. (UN, 2005)\r\nThe scope of the project precaution proviso activities included arrangement of venue, security department and emergency, judicature of logistics, managing media, budgeting and risk and contingency planning (Alam, 2008).\r\nStakeholder Analysis\r\nThis section of the report discusses the rouge stakeholders in the HK WWTO 2005 meeting, stakeholder analysis methods to effectively communicate with these stakeholders in order to check up on placid confabulation. Stakeholder Analysis is defined as the activeness which analyses in depth the attitudes of all the paint stakeholders towards a project (Goodpaster, 1991).\r\nOther definitions by researchers (freewoman, 1984) include ‘a group of ind ividuals who can chance on or be affect by the achievement of the organization objectives’.Key StakeholdersThe primal stakeholders of the WTO include the member nations, the vendors, tradesmen, farmers and other categories of trade associations, the media, the public, governing bodies, the international trade companionship. It besides includes the general population and public that are affected today or indirectly as a result of the agreements and arrangements made by the WTO Ministerial conference commissioning (Alam, 2008).High Power , High InterestOne of the member nations that holds high violence as well as high pursuanceingness in the World Trade Organisation. thither are a total of 153 nations in the WTO and the USA engages with various other nations and takes a loss loss leadership role in the WTO ministerial. For instance, USA played a key role in the capital of Qatar Conference and was blamed both directly and indirectly for holding up the dialog and the progress of the sessions. Given the high causation and sake it holds in the WTO, USA aims to throw out its exports. It plays a major role in the WTO negotiations to enhance its stance in the WTO as a ‘leader’ and withal to theatrical role the opportunity to initiate talks with its pass water partners like Japan and India. Given its advocate, intimately decisions of the trade-rounds are highly influenced by the coupled States (BBC, 2013).High Power, Low InterestHong Kong as one of the key members of the WTO was the host to the fifth ministerial conference in the year 2005. though existence a key member, Hong Kong has not shown practically interest in the activities of the WTO and has not taken any proactive steps in issue resolution of the ongoing issues of the WTO. Be it agriculture or environmental issues,Hong Kong stay to be a silent attestor in most cases which clearly indicates the neglect of interest in influencing the member states or steering t hem to decision making on specific issues (BBC, 2013).Low Power, High InterestThe farmers and the agriculture community worldwide have high interest in the activities of the WTO as the trade agreements that are negotiated and agreed upon have a heartbreaking bearing on their livelihood and concerns. There is a growing concern relating to fairer trade markets, food security and farming subsidies. Though on that point is a lot of interest shown by the farming community, they do not have the power to speak and consequently do not have the influencing capability. The augment in the suicide rates of farmers is also attributed to the failure of WTO to understand their concerns and the lack of enhancer and in luciferity in dealings of the WTO (Long, 2007; Shiva, 2014). look forers also suggest that there is a lack of understanding from the WTO committee members on the require of the farmers and the decisions made are not in by-line with their demands (Anderson and Martin, 2005).Low Power, Low InterestThe last compositors case of stakeholders have the least power and are also not very much interested in the activities of the WTO. The citizens of Hong Kong for example, belong to this stakeholder group. Given that the multilateral agreements are huge and complex, the politics do not have the aptitude and capability to scrutinise the details of all contracts. overly, the authorities of a country are not held accountable for the negotiations and agreements signed. This makes them lose interest given that they neither have the power nor the capacity to influence the decision making. Also there are restrictions that prohibit them from wondering(a) the authority (Keohane and Nye, 2001; Scharpf, 2000).\r\nStakeholder Management\r\nStakeholder management is internal for the smooth intercourse and functioning of an judicature and also to ensure that the objectives of the organisation are achieved. Stakeholder management should be in line with the strategic mana gement objectives of the organisation and the image of the stakeholder that needs to be satisfied should be taken into account depending on the organisation type in order to ensure that these expectations are met. It is prerequisite to first trace the various stakeholders, their role in the organisation, the decision making authority they have in the organisation and how much their ideas or ideals would affect the success of the organisation. Once these are identified, it is crucial to develop a stakeholder management dodge that is aimed at not only grateful these stakeholders but also helps achieve the overall objective of the organisation ( devoidman, 2001).\r\nIn a multicultural organisation or where the organisation is huge and spans across different continents and cultures, the stakeholder management strategy becomes inevitable. It defines the discourse methods and helps understanding the do’s and don’ts in each geographic location. It also helps achieve tr ansparency in operations and facilitates smash lodge of the stakeholders in the decision making process. Stronger business decisions that are sustainable, long term and estimable are facilitated by a good stakeholder management approach (Carroll and Buchholtz, 2014).Communication ManagementResearchers believe that not all stakeholders of an organisation have equal importance. For example, in a non-governmental organisation which is aimed at helping people, the pubic might be the key stakeholder as opposed to a business organisation which aims at pleasing the primary needs of the shareholders. Hence, in a different world where the needs of the organisations differ, it is essential to understand the primary stakeholders who needs to be satisfied and devise a communication management plan to ensure that the communication to these stakeholders are made in attached real-time and in an effective demeanor (Podnar and Jancic, 2006; Jacobson et al, 2009).Tuckman’s Communication ModelBruce Tuckman devised a quintuple step communication model in the year 1975.\r\nThese five steps includes:\r\nForming Storming Norming execute and Adjourning\r\nForming: This is where the leader gives the guidance to the team and the sign stage in the communication process. This is a stage where the roles and responsibilities are unclear\r\nStorming: brainstorm activities take place, compromises happen, clarity increases and the team members get a basic understanding of what is inevitable of them\r\nNorming: The team members agree by consensus. The leader facilitates the decision making but the team members are straightway in a position to agree. The roles and responsibilities defined by the leader in the forming stage are now very clear and evident.\r\nPerforming: The team members are strategically aware and are able to execute their responsibilities and perform better in order to achieve the goals. They work on their own and there is very little interference from the le ader. The leader is called for when there is guidance required both in terms of personal and interpersonal increment\r\nAdjourning: Also known as Deforming or Mourning, refers to the breaking up of the group after the successful completion of the task. This stage involves naming of good performers, the well-being of the team and also measuring the performance. (Tuckman, 1977)\r\nConclusion\r\nThis report gave a brief about the role of the project manager in the HK 2005 WTO ministerial conference and the various stakeholders, the level of interest and the power to influence the decision making of the WTO. Furthermore, this report also discussed effective stakeholder management techniques and methods, communication strategy in relation to the WTO.\r\nReferences\r\nFreeman (1984) Strategic Management, A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Boston\r\nPodnar, K., & Jancic, Z. (2006). Towards a categorization of stakeholder groups: An empirical verification of a three?level model. Journal of trade Communications, 12(4), 297-308.\r\nJacobson, S. K., & McDuff, M. D. (2009). Communication as an effective management strategy in a diverse world. Wildlife and Society: The Science of Human Dimensions.\r\nTuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Management, 2(4), 419-427.\r\nCarroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2014). Business and order of magnitude: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Cengage Learning.\r\nFreeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management.\r\nScharpf, F. W., & Schmidt, V. A. (Eds.). (2000). social welfare and work in the open economic system: volume ii: diverse responses to harsh challenges in twelve countries (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.\r\nKeohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). Power and mutualness (Vol. 3). New York: Longman.\r\nShiva, Vandana (2014) Of food, farmers and WTO’s doublespeak, useab le at: http://www.asianage.com/columnists/food-farmers-and-wto-s-doublespeak-972 accessed on 06/12/14\r\nLong, Jessica (2007):â€Å"WTO Kills Farmers”: India Free Market Reforms Trigger Farmers’ Suicides, Global Research\r\nAnderson, K. and Martin, W. (2005), Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda. World Economy, 28: 1301â€1327. inside: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00735.x\r\nBBC (2013): Profile: World Trade Organization, for sale at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/atomic number 63/country_profiles/2429503.stm accessed on 05/12/14\r\nWTO (2005): Hong Kong WTO Ministerial 2005: Briefing Notes, The â€Å"Win-Win” Potential for trade and environment, Available at: http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min05_e/brief_e/brief11_e.htm accessed on 05/12/14\r\nHKPA (2006): Hong Kong People’s Alliance on WTO, Wayback Machine, Available at: Accessed on 05/12/14\r\nTarget WTO (2005): Target World Trade Organisation, Available at: http://www.targ etwto.revolt.org/ Accessed on 05/12/14\r\nAlam S (2008): Sustainable Development and Free Trade, institutional Approaches, Routledge, UK\r\nHeydon K (2006): After the Hong Kong Ministerial confluence: What is at stake?, OECD, France\r\n unite Nations(2005): Perspectives from the ESCAP field after the Fifth WTO Ministerial contact: Ideas and Actions Following Cancun (Studies in Trade and Investment), United Nations\r\n'