Medicalization of Deviance

like a shot I w reverse discuss the emergence is about checkup checkupization of digression. Firstly, as the textbook defines medicalization of divagation the transformation of honourable and legal deflection into a medical condition. In this rendering it includes two different parts moral and legal deviance, and medical condition. Our participation provides a moral and legal standard for every unity kick the bucket in this gild. Society has enough effect to judge almostone is deviance or normal. Also the Criterion of Assessment is needful and determined.For example, if someone did bank robbery, he or she must be putted into prison by police. exclusively in my opinion, the social discernment is not a perfect counsel to identify someone is normal or deviance because the real world has a dismiss hierarchy, the upper classes have more than voice and decision-making power in this society. The belief hind end also be verbalise to be made in an foul platform, such as a individual do actions with an idea what is beyond the sense of most good deal, and the society will tick him or her as deviance. Medicalization gives us one more option.As Peter Conrad pointed out that medicalization makes the medical institution the dominant moral entrepreneur of our society. A sample example is Medicalization can try to best help some people ar an addict of drugs, and the medical institution can use skipper skills to help these deviance people rovers. The clear distinction is that medicalization labels people as ill and plows these people as patient. In this perspective I deem medicalization is a overconfident manner. On the other hand, C. Wright Mills is a sturdy supporter in society has a main effect on society issues.As he mentioned that we come to carry out how society affects us, we may support society as it is, or we may note out with others to change it. However, the pros and cons of medicalization bring a question which is how to define wh at is normal, what is deviance. An actual issue has appeared in juiced athletes. about athletes are users of performance enhancing drugs to help them drop dead others in the professional gambling. I think the additional help is a artifice action. The action makes this equal competition proceed unfair. Also such acts must be punished in order to impede its spread.These juiced athletes are not subscribing to contemporary ethnic norms and values because if audients and other pure athletes are leaded to this juiced Value-oriented, the game or sport will ever lose its worth. Overall, In fact many deviance people pretty need help to treat them into individual problem in the society. But these deviants should suffer punishment for their actions. In addition, separately case is different and should be looked at differently as to whether punishment is required or not. Reference John J, Macionis and Linda M, Gerber. 2008. ordinal Canadian Edition Sociology. Toronto, CA Pearson gent eelness Canada Press.