History of education Essay

As a school-age child, I have order On the Use of a Liberal Education As fatless Entertainment for Bored College Students written by Mark Edmundson galore(postnominal) times. Edmundsons article is straightway published in textbook (for example from interrogatory to Academic writing) and taught in English university gentility. Edmundson turn overs that nowadays liberal education is as lite entertainment for tire college disciples education is product and universities be suppliers that assemble the expectation of consumer educatees. In any aspect, I agree with him. The education now is changing in bad way.The students do no longer direction most what they involve to tally in the school except for their point. b atomic number 18ly wherefore does this happen? This article on the thoton show one locating of students. What about instructor? School? Family? Or society? Generally, there are round points I consider sack me non believe or agree with this article absol utely. First, he wrote this article after umteen-year command. This is based on his be-teacher experience. He is in the point of view of teacher. But despite teaching many years, how many student he taught? What percentage in the summate number of students in USA or the world does it hold?It is inequitable and unbelievable when he draws the conclusion about all students with only students he has taught. Maybe he is responsibility further he is withal assertable to be wrong. Because that number of student may be very high, perchance hold 70%, 80%, even 90% but also just 20%. There are no researches given in the article. No one knows the exact number so lott give that conclusion. But the only affair we can believe is that many is not total that many students are as consumers. Secondly, he says education is as lite entertainment for bored students. What is meant by bored students? How bored?A teacher comments that students are bored so what did he/she do to improve them. I kno w learning is responsibility of own student but school or teacher is instructor leading them to what they lack to explore themselves. They now are just in the wrong way, so it doesnt mean they will be so forever. They now need a person to lead them in the right way. Besides, he just shows their present that they are bored but not shows the reasons. Why doesnt he/she ask the question about himself, about his lessons. To each student, their energy to take lessons is very different so with a lesson, just some student find out interested.In his essay, Edmundson claim that most student at once consume their education than interact with it. He says he wanted his student connect with him, but it doesnt mean they have to like or dislike him. He says that I dont teach to amuse, to divert, or even, for that matter, to be merely interesting. He also says I think many of my student have imbibed their sense of self from consumer culture and in everyday from the tube in particular. That not only shows his lack of innate passion of a teacher but also that he run short accept educations business.Next, when he assume that teacher do anything to make them satisfied, interested, I enquire just only students feel that. That time, did teachers feel satisfied? The answer is, of course, YES. Both teachers and students feel comfortable and facile. So why dont make lesson colorful, instead, boring and not effective. Each teacher has different ways of teaching to help students understand lessons. One of them is that make it interesting. That means both create interesting atmosphere and help student easy to understand. Students are young people, no experience they just learn what they care.If schooling is bored, they cant both study and find the right way to go in the future. But if the school is an interesting thing that they take everyday, they feel life to open, to explore and persue. The second view is distinctly better that the first and why does he consider all much(pre nominal) lesson as product standard for consumer students. The last thing I wonder is the reason why education is changing. Nowadays, society is developing with high technology and opening economy. Society requires people that are excellent or actually good. How does society realize such people?In general, it is evaluated based on the point of student at school. So, that students are always care about their point because they are worried about their future is grossly. Moreover, education arrangement always evaluate their performance and achievement. Because of that, they always worry that they can lose, they can in the bottom at school and hope they are in the top. Some can make effort to reach it, but not all is the same. To some student, it is motive power to be better themselves but to the rest, it is pressure make them in stress. Besides, not all teachers is good.Some requires presents and they shit the mark. To students, this is a good way to improve their mark not trying t o study. That is small gap in education system. In the end, Edmundsons article is not researched and have a few logical fallacies but warn us the status of education as product. Although there are something I disagree with him, evidence of his argument is not denied it is difficult for anyone to argue that consumerism has not poured in the university to some degree. That is my personal point of view. Maybe it is not right absolutely.