.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Analysis on “How State Budgets Are Breaking Us Schools”

Semester 2 2011/2012 SBLE 2083 Public Speaking ( aggroup E) Prominent Speech Analysis on How assign budgets are breaking US schools Lecturer Nurul Nazifah binti Mat Noh Group Members Koo Chi Haw205634 Thong Hsien Jin205770 Mohammad Azlan bin Annual206955 Muhammad Noorhafizi bin Noor Azay 207278 Title How State budgets are breaking US schools In the beginning of the linguistic process, the chater did gained the attention and spare-time activity of the earshot by relating the subject field to the audience and stating the importance of the topic and relating the topic to the audience.He mentioned that And these budgetsare the key for our futuretheyre the key for our kids. This example fork outs that he was act to hit the audience intimately their future and their children. He also mentioned that the heavy(p) universities or community colleges most of the money for those thingsis coming out of these separate budgets. This means that state budgets are crucial for education sp halting in the United States. The speaker system unit did not introduce the topic travel byly in the beginning of the speech. He begun his speech exactly by saying Well, this is well-nigh state budgets. and And these budgetsare the key for our futuretheyre the key for our kids. These might only gave hints or questions to audience about the topic that was going to present by the speaker. The speaker did establish credibility by delegateing the numbers about the state budgets. He mentioned State budgetsare declamatory, astronomic money Ill show you the numbers. This means that he has the information that is relevant and is qualified to speak on this topic. The speaker did not really preview the body of the speech.It would not be clear either. He state that the state budgets are substantial for their future and their kids which only gave hints about how state budgets problems are going to relate to education spending. The speaker should capture preview the body of the spee ch by saying the briny points to the audience in the beginning of the speech. The speech thusly related to audience. The speaker already pointed out that the topic is very valuable for the throng to take considerations in the beginning, even though it is boring.The speaker was systematically informing the audience that if the state budget is not enough to overcompensate all the expenses due to deficit of 10%, the young depart to a greater extent than likely to be the victims as the majority of spending from the education provide be fleet to health-care medical for the old ones. It would affect many people of the U. S. in the future. The speaker also apply the word you frequently. This indicates that he is hard to relate the audience during the speech. After reviewing the video, the main points are the implications of the imbalanced state budget to the education expenses in current and future.The speaker aided his main points by using an effective visual aids and further formulate the main point by detailed elaborations and examples. Such methods are effectives to the audience to understand the topic clearly and relevant. First, the speaker introduced the state budgets and the deficits that occurred. Then, He move on to the implication on the education spending which is the system will construct a big squeeze if the expenses are mostly swift to health-care program by minimizing the expenses for the education in the deficit state budget.If such trend happened, the future education level will be bleached such as no bold experiment, no teacher authorization measurement and no incentives for the excellence teachers. The speaker used many theatrical role of methods in defying main points. Firstly, the speaker gave extended example about the cause of the state budgets deficit. He mentioned that When Jerry Brown was elected,this was the challenge that was put to him. That is, finished divers(a) gimmicks and things,a so-called balanced budgethad le d him to call for 25 billion missingout of the 76 billion in proposed spending.Now hes put together some thoughtsAbout half of that hell cut,another half, possibly in a very complex set of steps,taxes will be approved. entirely even so,as you go out into those future years,various pension costs, health costs go up enough,and the revenue does not go up enough. So you get a big squeeze. Secondly, the speaker also used hypothetical example such as But were spending 36 percent. Well what are we taking in? candid business question. Answer is 26 percent. Now this leaves 10 percent deficit, tell apart of a mind-blowing number. The speaker also used statistic method to support the main points.For the example, But we have a problem. Heres the overall picture. U. S. economy is big 14. 7 trillion. Now out of that pie,the government spends 36 percent. The speaker used a causal order where he first identified the state budgets deficit and what cause these deficits. Finally, he pointed out on how this affects the education spending by the government. The language used by the speaker is overall clear and concise. The speaker did used some familiar words that are intimately understand by the audience. The speaker also used many raise words which refer to subjects or concepts in his speech.For examples, medical innovation, gimmicks and big squeeze. However, the speaker used terms like Medicaid and Enron in his speech that would be not familiar with the audiences who are not living in United States. In the middle of the speech, the speaker also used a repetition as the rhythm of the speech. For example, Now how did we get here? How could you have a problem like this? . The speaker only used guide pull back as the connective in the speech. The connectives are used as he had begun next main points with questions. For examples, Now how did we get here?How could you have a problem like this? , Well whats going to give? and So what do we need to do? . This shows that the s peaker invited himself to answer and get the audience more involving with the speech. However, the signposts used are not really effective because they did not show the next or previous main points in the speech. In the end of the speech, the speaker signaled the end of the speech by saying, And so the bottom line is, to let the audience know that the speech was going to stop soon. The speaker also used a crescendo ending for his speech.He made a conclusion in which his speech was built to a zenith of power and forte that influence the audience to care about the state budgets. The speaker said that the state budgets are critical for their kids and their future. Now I think this is a solvable problem. Its a great country with lots of people. But we have to draw those people in,because this is about education. The speaker did reinforce the central idea of the speech by making a dramatic statement. He said, And plainly look at what happened with the tuitionswith the University of Ca liforniaand project that out for another three, four, phoebe bird years its unaffordable.

No comments:

Post a Comment